Head to head
Prodcheck vs Quiet Failures
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
4,372 pre-production checks: security, performance, scale, integrations, post-launch.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Open weekly security base rates (CC BY 4.0), plus live DMARC, takeover and WHOIS checks.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Prodcheck (92/100 against 56). Quiet Failures is hosted and callable through the gateway; Prodcheck runs on your own machine. Prodcheck has noticeably more public adoption.
| Prodcheck | Quiet Failures | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C56/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 15 | – |
| Downloads / week | 167 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | 6 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |