Head to head
Lan Direct vs Loadster
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Browser MCP: the app under test egresses via the real ISP while the agent stays on the VPN.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Load testing and synthetic monitoring platform: test with Playwright, Browser Bot, or Protocol Bots.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Loadster (100/100 against 88). Loadster is hosted and callable through the gateway; Lan Direct runs on your own machine.
| Lan Direct | Loadster | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 39 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-08 | 2026-09-10 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |