Head to head
web3ctx vs no_human
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
web3ctx
Aio.github.FarseenSh/web3ctxNo reviews yet
Version-true web3 docs, ABIs and human-validated integration recipes over MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
File a task with your local no_human and check on it: task_add and task_status over stdio.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours web3ctx (91/100 against 75). web3ctx is hosted and callable through the gateway; no_human runs on your own machine. no_human has noticeably more public adoption.
| web3ctx | no_human | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 317 |
| Downloads / week | – | 330 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | 2 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |