Head to head
exploitwatch vs deja-vu
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
exploitwatch
?app.vercel.exploitwatch-kappa/exploitwatchNo reviews yet
Check dependencies against CISA's real Known Exploited Vulnerabilities feed.
Full listingdeja-vu
Aio.github.vshulcz/deja-vuNo reviews yet
deja-vu: local memory over the session histories of thirty-three coding agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. exploitwatch is hosted and callable through the gateway; deja-vu runs on your own machine. deja-vu has noticeably more public adoption.
| exploitwatch | deja-vu | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | A92/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 847 |
| Downloads / week | – | 929 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |