Head to head
Tetrees MCP vs Site Audit
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Website intelligence audits for AI agents: free preview plus x402-paid Agent Readiness scoring
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tetrees MCP (84/100 against 69). Tetrees MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Tetrees MCP | Site Audit | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 304 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 26 | 7 |
| Write actions | 12 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |