Head to head
Tetrees MCP vs RelayShield Security Intelligence
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
RelayShield Security Intelligence
Bio.github.nzdsf2-gif/relayshield-mcpNo reviews yet
Breach, SIM swap, infostealer, domain lookalikes, MCP registry risk, prompt-injection detection.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (84 and 77 out of 100). Tetrees MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; RelayShield Security Intelligence runs on your own machine. Tetrees MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Tetrees MCP | RelayShield Security Intelligence | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 304 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 26 | — |
| Write actions | 12 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-06 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |