Head to head
Tetrees MCP vs isMalicious threat intelligence for AI agents
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Indicator reputation verdicts, CVE lookups (CVSS, EPSS, KEV) and prompt-injection scans for agents
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tetrees MCP (84/100 against 58). Tetrees MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; isMalicious threat intelligence for AI agents runs on your own machine. Tetrees MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Tetrees MCP | isMalicious threat intelligence for AI agents | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | C58/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 304 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | 36 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 26 | 6 |
| Write actions | 12 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |