Head to head
Vibesharing vs ShipStatic
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Deploy prototypes and collect team feedback from Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP client.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Deploy static websites from AI agents. Free at mcp.shipstatic.com — no install, no signup.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 88 out of 100). ShipStatic is hosted and callable through the gateway; Vibesharing runs on your own machine. ShipStatic has noticeably more public adoption.
| Vibesharing | ShipStatic | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 7 |
| Downloads / week | 45 | 1.8k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 31 | — |
| Write actions | 13 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |