Head to head
Heimdall vs China Market Access & Standards
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Every App Store Connect + StoreKit 2 endpoint. 890 tools in 13 profiles, narrow to 27.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Heimdall (83/100 against 67). China Market Access & Standards is hosted and callable through the gateway; Heimdall runs on your own machine. Heimdall has noticeably more public adoption.
| Heimdall | China Market Access & Standards | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 47 | – |
| Downloads / week | 357 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 32 | 6 |
| Write actions | 5 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |