Head to head
Perimeter Watch vs Fiori
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Perimeter Watch
?io.github.entradox/perimeter-watch-scannerNo reviews yet
Passive domain-perimeter checks — cert expiry, subdomain takeover, lookalikes — as agent tools
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Perimeter Watch is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fiori runs on your own machine. Fiori has noticeably more public adoption.
| Perimeter Watch | Fiori | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | A86/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 156 |
| Downloads / week | – | 77k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |