Head to head
Cited vs Husk
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Cited
Bio.github.entradox/cited-visibility-scannerNo reviews yet
AI-answer-engine visibility scans for local businesses, as agent tools
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local-first defensive scanner for vulnerable dependencies, leaked secrets, and risky agent configs
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Husk (91/100 against 79). Cited is hosted and callable through the gateway; Husk runs on your own machine.
| Cited | Husk | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B79/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 6 |
| Downloads / week | – | 72 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 9 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |