Head to head
Edgehound vs Testrail
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Writes adversarial test suites for AI-built code. Your agent's test engineer.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for TestRail platform, enabling LLMs to manage test artifacts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Edgehound (97/100 against 83). Edgehound is hosted and callable through the gateway; Testrail runs on your own machine. Testrail has noticeably more public adoption.
| Edgehound | Testrail | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 39 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.2k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |