Head to head
Enclave402 vs CRA AGENT
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Enclave402
Ccom.enclave402/enclave402No reviews yet
Pay-per-call agent tools: Polymarket signals, IPFS pinning, EIP-712 attestations. USDC on Base.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Lets an agent pay for x402 APIs in USDC on Arc, under a spending policy it cannot change.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CRA AGENT (89/100 against 69). Enclave402 is hosted and callable through the gateway; CRA AGENT runs on your own machine. CRA AGENT has noticeably more public adoption.
| Enclave402 | CRA AGENT | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 80 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |