Head to head
Emailkind vs smails
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Classify email addresses and domains by provider and type (business, personal, disposable).
Full listing
No reviews yet
Free disposable email for AI agents: a throwaway inbox to read verification codes over MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours smails (83/100 against 57). Emailkind is hosted and callable through the gateway; smails runs on your own machine. smails has noticeably more public adoption.
| Emailkind | smails | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 36 |
| Downloads / week | – | 59 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-06-26 |
| Category |