Head to head
Baseline vs Met
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Statistically rigorous weather and climate context: forecast plus 35-year historical ranking.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Weather forecasts from MET Norway (Yr): geocoding plus hourly forecasts worldwide.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 90 out of 100). Met is hosted and callable through the gateway; Baseline runs on your own machine.
| Baseline | Met | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 32 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | 8 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-08-22 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |