Head to head
ellmos FileCommander vs Vexor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Filesystem MCP server: files, processes, sessions, async search, OCR, archives, safe delete.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Vexor (83/100 against 72). Vexor has noticeably more public adoption.
| ellmos FileCommander | Vexor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B72/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 241 |
| Downloads / week | 274 | 594 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 46 | — |
| Write actions | 9 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-12 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |