Head to head
AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server vs Obelisk
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Nextcloud MCP server — files, calendar, contacts, mail, maps, notes, tasks & 120+ more tools
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Obelisk (85/100 against 64). AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server is hosted and callable through the gateway; Obelisk runs on your own machine. AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server | Obelisk | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C64/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 36 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 1.0k | 40 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-05 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |
Other comparisons
AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server vs Apple Tools (Unified)AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server vs Mac Shortcuts — read your Mac from any agentAIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server vs Vault CortexAIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server vs ObsidianAIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server vs Agent-Native CalendarAll Productivity servers