Head to head
KittyClaw vs Mu
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Drive KittyClaw, a self-hosted agent-fleet kanban, from any MCP client (embedded /mcp endpoint).
Full listing
No reviews yet
News, web search, mail, markets, weather, places, files, calendar, contacts. 67 tools, one endpoint.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Mu (84/100 against 68). Mu is hosted and callable through the gateway; KittyClaw runs on your own machine. Mu has noticeably more public adoption.
| KittyClaw | Mu | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 26 | 434 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 156 |
| Write actions | — | 27 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-24 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |