Head to head
ReviewGuard vs Github Status
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Safety boundary for agent written GitHub PR reviews: pending and invisible, submitting is opt-in
Full listingGithub Status
Cio.github.mrfentmen/github-status-mcpNo reviews yet
GitHub status from GitHub Status. No key required.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ReviewGuard (85/100 against 65). ReviewGuard has noticeably more public adoption.
| ReviewGuard | Github Status | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | — |
| GitHub stars | 4 | – |
| Downloads / week | 40 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 7 | 2 |
| Write actions | 3 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |