Mmcp.market

Head to head

E2LLM vs Browsentic

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

E2LLMcom.e2llm/element-to-llm
A
No reviews yet

E2LLM gives your AI eyes and hands in a real browser: structured perception (SiFR) plus action.

Full listing
Browsenticio.github.imshaikot/browsentic
A
No reviews yet

Hands your real, logged-in browser to your agent: an AI side panel extension, also over MCP.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours E2LLM (100/100 against 85). E2LLM is hosted and callable through the gateway; Browsentic runs on your own machine.

 E2LLMBrowsentic
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA100/100A85/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars626
Downloads / week–550
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools—1
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-022026-09-25
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

E2LLM vs ClickcastE2LLM vs Oya BrowserE2LLM vs domscoutE2LLM vs KitchenSink4WebE2LLM vs SeleniumBase MCPAll Scraping and browsing servers