Head to head
SmartCLI — drive terminal TUIs vs gflow-cli
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Let agents drive vim, htop, lazygit: send keys, wait on screen state, read the rendered cell grid.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 85 out of 100). gflow-cli has noticeably more public adoption.
| SmartCLI — drive terminal TUIs | gflow-cli | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 215 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |