Mmcp.market

Head to head

MCP ZAP Server vs Secobserve

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

MCP ZAP Serverio.github.dtkmn/mcp-zap-server
B
No reviews yet

Safe, self-hosted OWASP ZAP operator for guided AI security scans and reports.

Full listing
Secobserveio.github.nh4ttruong/secobserve-mcp
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for SecObserve: triage findings, import scan reports and SBOMs, generate VEX.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Secobserve (83/100 against 73).

 MCP ZAP ServerSecobserve
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB73/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars660
Downloads / week–381
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-222026-09-19
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

MCP ZAP Server vs n8n MCP CommunityMCP ZAP Server vs Firefly IiiMCP ZAP Server vs OpenQRMCP ZAP Server vs pkgxrayMCP ZAP Server vs MCPAll Security servers