Head to head
Ghl Command vs Grafana
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Ghl Command
Aio.github.drjerryrelth/ghl-commandNo reviews yet
GoHighLevel MCP for Claude: 250 tools, 51 modules, incl. the only programmatic GHL workflow builder
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Grafana (98/100 against 88). Grafana is hosted and callable through the gateway; Ghl Command runs on your own machine. Grafana has noticeably more public adoption.
| Ghl Command | Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 3.5k |
| Downloads / week | 2.0k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-07-26 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |