Mmcp.market

Head to head

Draugr vs Arcstone Sidecar

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Draugrdev.draugr/draugr
A
No reviews yet

Security scanning for AI agents: SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, DAST, ranked by real risk.

Full listing
Arcstone Sidecario.github.trencinodin-stack/arcstone-mcp-sidecar
C
No reviews yet

Deterministic execution boundary and reference MCP sidecar for Arcstone Security Stack

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Draugr (88/100 against 65).

 DraugrArcstone Sidecar
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA88/100C65/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars70
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-18
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Draugr vs MCPProxyDraugr vs Reversecore MCPDraugr vs MCP Security & Vulnerability AuditorDraugr vs npm Registry MCP ServerDraugr vs DebeziumAll Security servers