Head to head
Starling Bank vs IBAN Validator
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
IBAN Validator
Cio.github.peonixo147/iban-validatedNo reviews yet
Validate IBAN bank account numbers (format + mod-97 checksum). Returns whether the IBAN is valid.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Starling Bank (83/100 against 67). IBAN Validator is hosted and callable through the gateway; Starling Bank runs on your own machine. Starling Bank has noticeably more public adoption.
| Starling Bank | IBAN Validator | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 5 | – |
| Downloads / week | 179 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 24 | 1 |
| Write actions | 10 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-09 | — |
| Category | Finance | Finance |