Head to head
Teams vs Netdata
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Teams
Bio.github.dockndevai/mcp-teamsNo reviews yet
Read Microsoft Teams teams, channels, chats and messages, and post/reply/send, safe by default.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Real-time infrastructure monitoring with metrics, logs, alerts, and ML-based anomaly detection.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Netdata (88/100 against 80). Netdata is hosted and callable through the gateway; Teams runs on your own machine. Netdata has noticeably more public adoption.
| Teams | Netdata | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 81k |
| Downloads / week | 37 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |