Head to head
MCP Surface Lint vs KiCad MCP Pro
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Statically audits MCP tool surfaces for token cost, schema quality, and design issues.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Production-grade MCP server for KiCad EDA—PCB design, DRC, simulation, BOM, DFM, and manufacturing.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 89 out of 100). MCP Surface Lint is hosted and callable through the gateway; KiCad MCP Pro runs on your own machine. KiCad MCP Pro has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Surface Lint | KiCad MCP Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 95 |
| Downloads / week | – | 499 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 1 | 100 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Media | Media |