Head to head
clawops vs ShipStatic
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Deploy static websites from AI agents. Free at mcp.shipstatic.com — no install, no signup.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ShipStatic (88/100 against 74). ShipStatic is hosted and callable through the gateway; clawops runs on your own machine.
| clawops | ShipStatic | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B74/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 5 | 7 |
| Downloads / week | 180 | 1.8k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 15 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |