Head to head
Windframe vs KiCad MCP Pro
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Provides style context & tokens to design or restyle web UIs in any framework
Full listing
No reviews yet
Production-grade MCP server for KiCad EDA—PCB design, DRC, simulation, BOM, DFM, and manufacturing.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours KiCad MCP Pro (89/100 against 67). Windframe is hosted and callable through the gateway; KiCad MCP Pro runs on your own machine. KiCad MCP Pro has noticeably more public adoption.
| Windframe | KiCad MCP Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 95 |
| Downloads / week | – | 499 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 100 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Media | Media |