Head to head
upAPI vs Bluesky
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
All public upAPI operations as MCP tools: web scraping, search, screenshots, PDF, OCR and more.
Full listingBluesky
Cio.github.mrfentmen/bluesky-mcpNo reviews yet
Bluesky actor search from the public AT Protocol API. No key required.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours upAPI (99/100 against 65). upAPI is hosted and callable through the gateway; Bluesky runs on your own machine. upAPI has noticeably more public adoption.
| upAPI | Bluesky | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | — |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 213 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |