Mmcp.market

Head to head

UI Debugger vs Testorim

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

UI Debuggerio.github.developerz-ai/ui-debugger-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Autonomous UI debugging MCP server: an agent drives the browser/desktop, reports bugs + UX issues.

Full listing
Testorimio.github.sallar-ba/testorim
C
No reviews yet

AI browser tests from your coding agent: a verdict, failing steps, report, video and trace.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours UI Debugger (82/100 against 55). UI Debugger has noticeably more public adoption.

 UI DebuggerTestorim
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB82/100C55/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars2–
Downloads / week670
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools5—
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-17—
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

UI Debugger vs Ui.Vision MCPUI Debugger vs Agent360 Browser MCPUI Debugger vs Native DevToolsUI Debugger vs FableCutUI Debugger vs Bun UiaAll Scraping and browsing servers