Head to head
Devart MCP Server for SQL Server (ADO.NET) vs Supabase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Schema-aware read/write access to SQL Server through Devart dotConnect ADO.NET data provider.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Supabase (100/100 against 63). Supabase is hosted and callable through the gateway; Devart MCP Server for SQL Server (ADO.NET) runs on your own machine. Supabase has noticeably more public adoption.
| Devart MCP Server for SQL Server (ADO.NET) | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C63/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | New | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 2.9k |
| Downloads / week | – | 76k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-03 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |
Other comparisons
Devart MCP Server for SQL Server (ADO.NET) vs MCP Toolbox for DatabasesDevart MCP Server for SQL Server (ADO.NET) vs GeoLensDevart MCP Server for SQL Server (ADO.NET) vs NeonDevart MCP Server for SQL Server (ADO.NET) vs Magic CloudDevart MCP Server for SQL Server (ADO.NET) vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerAll Databases servers