Head to head
Linkedin vs Linkedin Data
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
LinkedIn for AI assistants — search, profiles, jobs, feed, messaging, and gated writes.
Full listing
No reviews yet
LinkedIn data for AI agents: profiles, companies, jobs, posts, search. Sales research, recruiting.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Linkedin Data (98/100 against 88). Linkedin Data is hosted and callable through the gateway; Linkedin runs on your own machine.
| Linkedin Data | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 10 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 103 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 22 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-27 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |