Mmcp.market

Head to head

Laserbrain vs ctxlint

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Laserbrainio.github.degibug-del/laserbrain
C
No reviews yet

The drift harness as an MCP server. Offline, no key — a fixed reference an agent checks against.

Full listing
ctxlintio.github.YawLabs/ctxlint
A
No reviews yet

Lint AI agent context files (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.) against your actual codebase

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ctxlint (91/100 against 57). ctxlint has noticeably more public adoption.

 Laserbrainctxlint
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC57/100A91/100
Adoption—Established
GitHub stars–9
Downloads / week–7.9k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release—2026-09-15
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Laserbrain vs DvalincodeLaserbrain vs IWELaserbrain vs Agent CommsLaserbrain vs sqzLaserbrain vs Agent SearchAll AI and agents servers