Head to head
deerdawn vs mcp-grafana
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AI session memory: the brief your AI reads before every session so no session starts cold.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (93 and 98 out of 100). mcp-grafana has noticeably more public adoption.
| deerdawn | mcp-grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 3.5k |
| Downloads / week | 413 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-14 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |