Head to head
DeepSearch vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Research a person's public footprint from a name, phone, email, or username. Sourced.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Send email, look up public IP information, and convert files to Markdown through SendSoon.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (80/100 against 59). DeepSearch is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| DeepSearch | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C59/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 6 |
| Downloads / week | – | 36 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 3 | 3 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-08-27 |
| Category |