Head to head
MCP Server vs travel.art
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Enable your AI agents to scrape and parse web content dynamically, including geo-restricted sites
Full listing
No reviews yet
Art-tourism data for AI agents: biennales, art fairs, museums, layover itineraries with 2026 facts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (94 and 89 out of 100). travel.art is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine. MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Server | travel.art | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 37 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 324 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 30 | 4 |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | ISC | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |