Head to head
MCP Server vs Content-Location URL shape, value discarded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Enable your AI agents to scrape and parse web content dynamically, including geo-restricted sites
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (94 and 91 out of 100). Content-Location URL shape, value discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine. MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Server | Content-Location URL shape, value discarded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 37 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 324 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 30 | 30 |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | ISC | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |