Head to head
MCP vs qikly
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Generates tests from acceptance criteria, then converges code with an agent that never sees them.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (99 and 92 out of 100). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; qikly runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | qikly | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 533 | 12 |
| Downloads / week | 297 | 663 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |