Head to head
MCP vs Domain Security
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
20 domain recon tools for AI agents: DNS, SSL, headers, email, subdomains, lookalikes, changes.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Audit a domain's email and web security: SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, DNSSEC, TLS, WHOIS. No API keys.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 92 out of 100). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Domain Security runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Domain Security | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 559 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 20 | 19 |
| Write actions | 2 | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category |