Head to head
MCP vs SecOps Field Notes
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
20 domain recon tools for AI agents: DNS, SSL, headers, email, subdomains, lookalikes, changes.
Full listing
No reviews yet
CVSS scoring, IOC extraction, email header triage, hash/JWT/timestamp decoding, CISA KEV lookup.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 88 out of 100). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; SecOps Field Notes runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | SecOps Field Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 559 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 20 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-07 |
| Category |