Head to head
decaframe vs fiori-mcp-server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Presentations, slides, reports and one-pagers your agent designs and you edit. Exports to one file.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours decaframe (94/100 against 86). fiori-mcp-server has noticeably more public adoption.
| decaframe | fiori-mcp-server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 156 |
| Downloads / week | 448 | 77k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |