Head to head
Prism Coder vs Nanograms to grams, number discarded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Prism Coder
Cio.github.dcostenco/prism-coderNo reviews yet
Session memory for coding agents: local-first recall, drift detection, on-device inference.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Nanograms to grams, number discarded (91/100 against 68). Nanograms to grams, number discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; Prism Coder runs on your own machine. Prism Coder has noticeably more public adoption.
| Prism Coder | Nanograms to grams, number discarded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 157 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.3k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 57 | 30 |
| Write actions | 3 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |