Mmcp.market

Head to head

DBConvert Streams (Federated SQL) vs PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

DBConvert Streams (Federated SQL)com.dbconvert/streams
A
No reviews yet

Read-only SQL across your PostgreSQL, MySQL, S3 buckets and local data files, in one query.

Full listing
PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)io.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardened
C
No reviews yet

Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours DBConvert Streams (Federated SQL) (85/100 against 68).

 DBConvert Streams (Federated SQL)PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100C68/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars243
Downloads / week–91
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-052026-09-20
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

DBConvert Streams (Federated SQL) vs DBHubDBConvert Streams (Federated SQL) vs LINQ to DBDBConvert Streams (Federated SQL) vs Magic CloudDBConvert Streams (Federated SQL) vs ShrikeDBConvert Streams (Federated SQL) vs csvqlAll Databases servers