Mmcp.market

Head to head

AI Agent Analytics vs mcp-local-rag

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

AI Agent Analyticsio.github.davisvillelabs/ai-agent-analytics
C
No reviews yet

Seller-side analytics for AI-agent discovery, settled revenue, delivery, and repeat use.

Full listing
mcp-local-ragio.github.shinpr/mcp-local-rag
A
No reviews yet

Easy-to-setup local RAG server with minimal configuration

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-local-rag (92/100 against 67). AI Agent Analytics is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-local-rag runs on your own machine. mcp-local-rag has noticeably more public adoption.

 AI Agent Analyticsmcp-local-rag
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100A92/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–399
Downloads / week–4.7k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools11—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

AI Agent Analytics vs ha-mcpAI Agent Analytics vs IWEAI Agent Analytics vs fiori-mcp-serverAI Agent Analytics vs mcp-ts-coreAI Agent Analytics vs mockserverAll AI and agents servers