Mmcp.market

Head to head

Uptime Kuma vs Zhiyong Agent Network

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Uptime Kumaio.github.DavidFuchs/mcp-uptime-kuma
B
No reviews yet

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Uptime Kuma version 2.

Full listing
Zhiyong Agent Networkio.github.ray999/knowledge-graph
C
No reviews yet

Discover Agents and MCP capabilities with versions, permissions, and real-work trust context.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Uptime Kuma (83/100 against 57). Zhiyong Agent Network is hosted and callable through the gateway; Uptime Kuma runs on your own machine. Uptime Kuma has noticeably more public adoption.

 Uptime KumaZhiyong Agent Network
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C57/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars49–
Downloads / week357–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools3111
Write actions13
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-09-13—
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents