Head to head
browser-automation vs mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
browser-automation
Bio.github.DataLeadsPRO/browser-automationNo reviews yet
Programmatic headless browser sessions: create, interact, browse, and extract - rendered in a real
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server with WebdriverIO for browser and mobile app automation (iOS/Android via Appium)
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (80 and 86 out of 100). browser-automation is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp runs on your own machine. mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| browser-automation | mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 39 |
| Downloads / week | – | 5.3k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |