Mmcp.market

Head to head

Browser Automation vs Stealthy Auto Browse

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Browser Automationio.github.DataLeadsPRO/browser-automation
B
No reviews yet

Programmatic headless browser sessions: create, interact, browse, and extract - rendered in a real

Full listing
Stealthy Auto Browseio.github.psyb0t/stealthy-auto-browse
A
No reviews yet

Self-hosted MCP server for stealth browser automation with human-like OS-level input.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Stealthy Auto Browse (88/100 against 80). Browser Automation is hosted and callable through the gateway; Stealthy Auto Browse runs on your own machine.

 Browser AutomationStealthy Auto Browse
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB80/100A88/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars081
Downloads / week
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools5
Write actions2
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONWTFPL
Last release2026-09-172026-09-13
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons