Head to head
Knowl vs jCodemunch MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Persistent memory for Claude Code, Cursor and Codex. Facts retire when they change.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Token-efficient code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing. 70+ languages, 86-99% token savings.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Knowl (92/100 against 66). Knowl is hosted and callable through the gateway; jCodemunch MCP runs on your own machine.
| Knowl | jCodemunch MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C66/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 86 | 2.7k |
| Downloads / week | 429 | 6.0k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 30 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |