Head to head
Darwin vs upAPI
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search public AI capabilities and coordinate approved work through Darwin's Search to Act interface.
Full listing
No reviews yet
All public upAPI operations as MCP tools: web scraping, search, screenshots, PDF, OCR and more.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours upAPI (99/100 against 60). upAPI has noticeably more public adoption.
| Darwin | upAPI | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A99/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 213 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |